Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Night Life VanCleef
Okay, listen up, sissies. I have no idea who VanCleef is. In fact, I care so little about this VanCleef character that I'm not even gonna bother looking him up in the Google toolbar that is a short mouse-click away.
Let me tell you about who I do care about:
Robert E. Lee.
That's right commies, Robert E. Lee.
This guy was the badass of the Civil War. He was the Napoleon Bonapart of the Confederacy. And just like Napoleon, he died too soon.
The world would be very different if the Rebels had won the Civil War. There would be no blacks, for one. There would also be no republicans. Go ahead and reflect on that for a second while I gather some more info.
Okay, back. It turns out that there are no web documents that tell what the Civil War was really about. All available positions on the web are directed towards slavery, which I assure you, is not the main cause of the Civil War. If slavery were the main cause of the Civil War, then why did the South fight it's own battles instead of using black slaves as troops? Thought so.
Although this isn't available on Prickipedia, I think that the succession of the Southern States from the Union was about politics and people. The Union were all Nazi Replublicans, and the South were all Democrats. Unfortunately, the South lost and Republicans still exist today.
I wish we, as modern Americans, would stand up for what we believe in and fight for what's right. I think we should have rioted the first time G.W. Bush was elected and forcefully taken him out of office.
The moral of this story is: kill republicans.
-bobby v
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
firstly, Robert E. Lee ain't got shit on Gen. Beauregard Lee!
ReplyDeleteand secondofly, it's SECESSION, not succession! perhaps you should employ a spell and grammar checker!
thirdly, there is only one van cleef that matters in this world and that's van cleef and arpels!
ninja out!
itachixxx